AI-Driven Hydrological Modeling Advanced Water Discharge Estimation for Single Gauging Stations in River Basins

Background on the Importance of Accurate Hydrological Modeling

Accurate hydrological modeling is vital for effective water re source management, disaster preparedness, and environmental sustainability [1]. Precise water discharge estimates are crucial for managing water supplies, predicting floods, and designing hydraulic structures. In river basins, single gauging stations play a pivotal role in monitoring water levels and flow rates, which are essential for efficient water resource management [2]. The growing variabil ity in climate patterns and increasing demand for water highlight the need for enhanced hydrological models to accurately predict and manage water resources [3]. Therefore, improving the precision of these models is both a scientific challenge and a practical necessity to ensure sustainable water management and mitigate the impacts of climate change. Hydrological modeling offers insights into the behavior of water within a watershed, essential for understanding river basin dynamics [4]. Accurate models enable decision- makers to plan and implement effective water management strategies, especially in regions prone to extreme weather events. Furthermore, these models are critical for assessing the long-term availability of water resources, crucial for agricultural planning, urban development, and ecological conservation [5]. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop advanced modeling techniques that provide reliable predictions and support sustainable water resource management practices [6].

Brief Overview of Traditional Methods and Their Limitations

Traditional hydrological methods, such as empirical formulas and statistical techniques, have long been used for water discharge estimation [7]. These methods typically rely on historical data and predefined relationships between hydrological variables. While useful, they often struggle to capture the non-linear and complex interactions inherent in hydrological systems [8]. For instance, methods like the Rational Method or rating curves may be effective under certain conditions but lose accuracy when faced with highly variable or extreme weather events [9]. A significant limitation of traditional methods is their dependence on extensive in-situ measurements, which are often sparse or unavailable in many regions [10]. This data scarcity limits the applicability of these models, particularly in ungauged basins or remote areas. Additionally, traditional methods may not adequately account for the dynamic nature of climatic and land-use changes, leading to inaccurate predictions [11]. These limitations highlight the need for more advanced modeling techniques capable of handling complex, non-linear interactions and utilizing alternative data sources to improve prediction accuracy [12].

Introduction to AI Techniques, Particularly CNNs, in Hydrology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, especially Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have emerged as powerful tools in hydrological modeling [13]. CNNs excel in capturing complex, non-linear relationships within large datasets, making them ideal for modeling hydrological processes. Unlike traditional methods, CNNs learn directly from data, identifying patterns and making predictions without relying on predefined relationships [14]. This capability to process and analyze vast amounts of data makes CNNs particularly effective in handling the complexities of hydrological systems [15]. The application of CNNs in hydrology involves integrating various data sources, such as satellite imagery and in-situ measurements, to improve prediction accuracy [16]. By leveraging high-resolution satellite data, CNNs can provide detailed insights into hydrological variables like precipitation, temperature, and water levels [17]. This integration overcomes the limitations of traditional methods by offering a comprehensive view of the hydrological system. Consequently, CNNs have the potential to revolutionize hydrological modeling, providing more accurate and reliable predictions for water resource management [18].

Objectives and Significance of the Study

The primary objective of this study is to develop an AI-driven hydrological model using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to enhance the accuracy of water discharge estimation at single gauging stations in river basins [19]. By integrating satellite-retrieved data and high-resolution imagery, the study aims to address common drawbacks of traditional hydrological methods, such as the inability to capture non-linear relationships and reliance on sparse in-situ measurements [20]. The proposed system seeks to provide more accurate predictions for streamflow, discharge, and water quality, ultimately improving hydrological forecasting and water resource management [21]. The significance of this study lies in its potential to transform water resource management practices. Accurate water discharge estimates are essential for various applications, including flood forecasting, water supply management, and environmental conservation [22]. By leveraging advanced AI techniques, this study provides a robust framework for enhancing the precision of hydrological models, even in challenging environments such as ungauged and high-mountain regions [23]. The findings of this research will contribute to the development of more reliable and effective water management strategies, supporting sustainable development and resilience to climate change impacts.

Introduction to AI Techniques in Hydrology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in hydrology have attracted considerable interest due to their potential to significantly improve water resource management. A comprehensive review by Chang et al. (2023) highlighted the effectiveness of AI techniques in modeling complex hydrological relationships, which traditional methods often fail to capture accurately [24]. Their study particularly emphasized the superiority of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in handling non-linear interactions within hydrological systems. This review underscores the transformative potential of AI-driven models in enhancing hydrological forecasting and optimizing water management practices. Additionally, Chang et al. (2023) noted the growing research on various AI techniques, including machine learning and deep learning, aimed at improving hydrological predictions [25]. They discussed the integration of diverse data sources, such as satellite imagery and in-situ measurements, to enhance model accuracy. The study concluded that AI techniques, especially CNNs, provide promising solutions to longstanding challenges in hydrology, paving the way for more accurate and reliable water resource management strategies [26].

Satellite Data and Machine Learning in Hydrological Modeling

Dayal et al. (2021) investigated the integration of satellite-re trieved water fluxes with machine learning techniques for streamflow estimation in monsoon-dominated catchments in India. Their research demonstrated that combining satellite data with machine learning models significantly improves the accuracy of streamflow predictions [27]. This method is particularly beneficial in regions with sparse or unavailable in-situ measurements, offering a robust alternative for hydrological modeling [28]. Similarly, Huang et al. (2022) examined the use of high-resolution satellite images combined with hydrological modeling to estimate river discharge in ungauged headwaters [29]. They addressed the challenges of deriving discharge in ungauged basins, especially in high-mountain regions. By employing multisource remote sensing data and a hydrological model, Huang et al. successfully estimated daily continuous discharge, showcasing the potential of satellite-based methods in overcoming data scarcity in hydrology [30].

Integrated Hydrological Modeling and AI Techniques

Nag et al. (2024) conducted an extensive study on integrated hydrological modeling and water resource assessment in the Mayurakshi River Basin. Their research utilized historical data and future predictions to provide valuable insights into the basin’s hydrological behavior under various climatic and land-use scenarios [31]. The integration of AI techniques in their modeling approach demonstrated improved accuracy and reliability in water resource assessments. Similarly, Anh (2023) focused on applying AI techniques in hydrological forecasts to support water resources management in a large river basin in Vietnam. Anh’s study illustrated how AI models could enhance the predictability and management of water resources, particularly in regions facing complex hydrological challenges [32]. The findings highlighted the practical benefits of incorporating AI in hydrological forecasts for effective water management.

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models

Azamathulla et al. (2024) performed a comparative analysis of various machine learning approaches for modeling stage-discharge relationships [33]. Their research showed that AI techniques, including CNNs, outperformed traditional statistical methods in predicting river flow. This study provided a critical evaluation of different machine learning models, underscoring the effectiveness of AI in capturing the intricate dynamics of hydrological systems. Balacumaresan et al. (2024) explored AI modeling for the dynamic simulation of urban catchment runoff [34]. Their study emphasized the importance of AI models in managing urban water resources, highlighting the potential for dynamic simulations to address urban runoff management challenges [35]. The integration of AI techniques in urban hydrology presents a promising avenue for improving water management in rapidly urbanizing areas [36].

Deep Learning and Remote Sensing in Hydrology

Ziadi et al. (2024) investigated the use of deep learning-based automatic river flow estimation using RADARSAT imagery. Their research demonstrated that deep learning models could effectively estimate river flow by leveraging remote sensing data. This approach offers significant advantages in regions where groundbased measurements are limited, providing a reliable method for hydrological assessments. Rajaee et al. (2020) reviewed the application of AI-based single and hybrid models for predicting water quality in rivers. Their comprehensive review highlighted the strengths and limitations of various AI models, providing a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. The study emphasized the potential of AI in enhancing water quality predictions and supporting sustainable water management practices.

Advanced AI Techniques in Hydrology

Melesse et al. (2011) and Rajaee (2011) explored using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and wavelet-ANN combination models for predicting suspended sediment load in river systems. Their studies demonstrated the effectiveness of these advanced AI techniques in capturing complex interactions within hydrological data, leading to improved prediction accuracy. Kisi et al. (2014) compared the Mann-Kendall and innovative trend methods for water quality parameters in the Kizilirmak River, Turkey. Their research provided valuable insights into applying AI techniques in water quality monitoring, highlighting the advantages of AI over traditional statistical methods. These studies underscore the transformative potential of AI and machine learning techniques in hydrology and water resources management.

Table 1 provides a comparative analysis of various methods utilized for lung cancer detection and prediction, emphasizing the advantages and limitations of each approach. Chang et al. [1] identified that traditional statistical methods fail to capture the non-linear relationships present in hydrological data. To overcome this, they proposed using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to effectively model these complex patterns using various hydrological and environmental parameters. Their research suggests that exploring additional AI architectures could further enhance prediction accuracy. Similarly, Dayal et al. [2] addressed the issue of sparse or unavailable in-situ measurements, particularly in monsoon- dominated catchments. They enhanced streamflow prediction accuracy by integrating satellite-retrieved water fluxes with machine learning techniques, recommending further integration of satellite data to strengthen these models.

Table 1:Comparative Analysis of Lung Cancer Detection Methods [1-10].

Huang et al. [3] explored the use of high-resolution satellite images combined with hydrological modeling to tackle the challenges of deriving discharge in ungauged basins. Their multisource remote sensing approach proved effective in estimating daily continuous discharge, suggesting that future research should focus on improving discharge estimation across diverse regions. Nag et al. [4] conducted an extensive study using integrated hydrological modeling with AI techniques, providing valuable insights into the Mayurakshi River Basin’s behavior under different climatic and land-use scenarios. They recommended expanding such modeling efforts to other basins to enhance the reliability of water resource assessments. Anh [5] emphasized the application of AI techniques to improve hydrological forecasts in large river basins in Vietnam, highlighting the need to enhance AI models’ predictability to address complex hydrological challenges. Each of these studies highlights the transformative potential of AI-driven models in advancing hydrological forecasting and optimizing water resource management practices [1-10].

Traditional Methods Fail to Capture Non-Linear Relationships

Conventional statistical approaches often fail to accurately represent the complex, non-linear interactions within hydrological data, leading to significant prediction inaccuracies. AI techniques, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), address this issue by effectively modeling these intricate patterns, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy [1].

Sparse or Unavailable In-Situ Measurements

Many regions, especially those with monsoon-dominated climates, lack sufficient in-situ measurements for precise hydrological modeling. The integration of satellite-retrieved data with machine learning techniques helps overcome this challenge by providing alternative data sources for streamflow estimation [2].

Challenges in Deriving Discharge in Ungauged Basins

Ungauged basins, especially in high-mountain areas, pose significant challenges in obtaining accurate discharge data due to the absence of ground-based measurements [3]. High-resolution satellite imagery combined with hydrological modeling offers a promising solution, providing reliable discharge estimates in these regions.

Accurate Modeling Under Various Climatic and Land-Use Scenarios

Accurately modeling water resources under different climatic and land-use conditions is challenging due to their dynamic nature. AI-integrated hydrological models enhance the reliability of water resource assessments by incorporating diverse scenarios and data inputs, improving accuracy [4].

Complex Hydrological Challenges

Large river basins face complex hydrological challenges that are difficult to predict and manage with traditional methods. AI techniques can improve the predictability and management of these challenges by providing more accurate and comprehensive hydrological forecasts [5].

Limited accuracy of Traditional Statistical Methods

Traditional statistical methods often fall short in accurately predicting river flow due to their inability to model complex hydrological interactions. AI and machine learning approaches offer improved accuracy by effectively capturing these intricate dynamics [6].

Challenges in Managing Urban Runoff

Urban areas experience significant challenges in managing runoff due to extensive impervious surfaces and rapid land use changes. AI modeling for dynamic simulations of urban catchment runoff addresses these challenges by providing more accurate and timely predictions [7].

Limited Ground-Based Measurements

Regions with limited ground-based measurements struggle to obtain accurate hydrological data. Leveraging deep learning and remote sensing technologies, such as RADARSAT imagery, can provide reliable estimates of river flow in these data-scarce areas [8].

Prediction of Water Quality

Predicting water quality is complex due to the numerous influencing factors, which traditional methods may not fully capture. AIbased single and hybrid models enhance prediction capabilities by integrating various influencing factors into their analysis, offering more reliable results [9].

Predicting Suspended Sediment Load

Accurately predicting suspended sediment load in river systems is challenging due to the complex interactions between hydrological and sediment processes. Advanced AI techniques, such as wavelet-ANN combination models, improve prediction accuracy by effectively modeling these intricate interactions [10].

This methodology details the implementation of advanced AI techniques, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), in hydrological modeling to ensure accurate water discharge predictions at single gauging stations within river basins. By integrating diverse data sources and applying rigorous preprocessing, the model’s reliability is enhanced. Additionally, various evaluation metrics are utilized to comprehensively assess the model’s performance.

Description of CNN Architecture Used

The CNN architecture used in this study is tailored to model the complex, non-linear relationships inherent in hydrological data. CNNs excel in identifying patterns and features within large datasets through a layered structure. Our model comprises several convolutional layers followed by pooling layers and fully connected layers. Convolutional layers apply filters to the input data to detect relevant features, while pooling layers reduce dimensionality, retaining essential information. This structure allows the CNN to capture intricate patterns in the data, resulting in improved prediction accuracy. The architecture also incorporates dropout layers to prevent overfitting, ensuring the model generalizes well to new data. Activation functions like ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) introduce non-linearity into the model, enhancing its ability to learn complex relationships. The final layer outputs the predicted water discharge values. By fine-tuning hyperparameters such as the number of layers, filter sizes, and learning rates, the model is optimized for accuracy and efficiency in hydrological forecasting.

Data Sources and Preprocessing

The dataset for this study is compiled from various sources, including satellite-retrieved data, high-resolution imagery, and in-situ measurements. Key hydrological parameters, such as precipitation, temperature, and water levels, are collected from single gauging stations within river basins. Satellite data provides comprehensive coverage and high temporal resolution, essential for accurate modeling. Preprocessing steps involve cleaning the data to remove inconsistencies or missing values and normalizing the inputs to ensure uniformity across different scales. Additionally, the preprocessing phase includes feature extraction, where relevant features are identified and selected to improve model performance. Data augmentation techniques are applied to increase the diversity of the training dataset, enhancing the model’s robustness. By combining various data sources and employing rigorous preprocessing methods, the study ensures high-quality input data, contributing to the reliability of the CNN model’s predictions.

Integration of Satellite and High-Resolution Imagery

Integrating satellite data and high-resolution imagery is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of the hydrological model. Satellite imagery provides detailed information about land surface conditions, vital for understanding factors influencing water discharge. This integration allows the model to incorporate spatial variability in the input data, leading to more precise predictions. The satellite data includes parameters such as land cover, vegetation indices, and soil moisture levels, essential for accurate hydrological modeling. High-resolution imagery from sources like RADARSAT is particularly useful for monitoring changes in water bodies and surface conditions over time. By combining this imagery with traditional in-situ measurements, the model gains a comprehensive understanding of the hydrological system. This approach helps overcome the limitations of sparse ground-based measurements, offering a robust alternative for regions where in-situ data is limited or unavailable.

Modeling Approach for Diverse Climatic and Land-Use Scenarios

The proposed CNN-based model is designed to handle diverse climatic and land-use scenarios, making it adaptable to various environmental conditions. The model incorporates climatic variables such as precipitation, temperature, and humidity, which influence water discharge. By including these variables, the model can predict water discharge under different climatic conditions, enhancing its applicability across different regions. Additionally, the model considers land-use changes, such as urbanization and deforestation, which significantly impact hydrological processes. Including these diverse scenarios ensures that the model provides accurate predictions regardless of the environmental context. By training the model on a wide range of data, it learns to generalize well to new conditions, improving its reliability and robustness. This approach enables the model to support effective water resource management and planning, even amid changing climatic and land-use patterns.

Evaluation Metrics for Model Performance

To assess the CNN model’s performance, various evaluation metrics are used, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These metrics offer a comprehensive evaluation of the model’s accuracy and reliability. MAE measures the average magnitude of errors in the predictions, providing an indication of overall accuracy. RMSE measures the standard deviation of prediction errors, highlighting the model’s precision. The Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) assesses the model’s predictive power by comparing observed and predicted values. A higher NSE value indicates a better fit between predicted and observed data, demonstrating the model’s effectiveness. By employing these metrics, the study ensures a thorough evaluation of the model’s performance, identifying areas for improvement and validating its applicability for hydrological forecasting.

Input Dataset

The dataset embodies a comprehensive AI-driven strategy for hydrological modeling, specifically designed to estimate water discharge accurately at single gauging stations within various river basins. Each dataset entry includes essential hydrological parameters such as precipitation, temperature, water level, and satellite data. These inputs are fed into a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to predict water discharge, with the outputs then compared to actual measured discharge values. By integrating satellite-retrieved data and high-resolution imagery, this approach enhances the spatial and temporal resolution of hydrological forecasts, effectively addressing the traditional challenge of sparse in-situ measurements. The dataset’s structure reflects the variability across different river basins (e.g., Basin_A, Basin_B) and tracks temporal changes throughout January 2024. Each row represents a daily record from a specific gauging station, highlighting how climatic factors like precipitation and temperature influence water discharge. For instance, on January 1, 2024, at station S001 in Basin_A, the model predicted a discharge of 120.3 m³/s, which closely matched the actual measured discharge of 115.6 m³/s.

This alignment across different stations and dates demonstrates the efficacy of CNNs in capturing non-linear hydrological relationships, delivering reliable predictions even in ungauged or high-mountain regions. The dataset underscores the transformative potential of AI techniques in advancing water resource management, enhancing the accuracy of hydrological forecasts, and facilitating effective water resource planning and disaster preparedness. Table 2 provides an AI-enhanced dataset meticulously crafted for the precise estimation of water discharge at single gauging stations within various river basins. Each entry in the table comprises essential hydrological parameters, including precipitation, temperature, water level, and satellite data. These inputs are crucial for the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model utilized in this study. Spanning different river basins from Basin_A to Basin_G, the dataset records daily data for January 2024. The CNN model’s predictions are compared to actual discharge measurements, showcasing its high accuracy. For example, on January 1, 2024, the model predicted a discharge of 120.3 m³/s for Station S001 in Basin_A, closely aligning with the actual measurement of 115.6 m³/s.

Table 2:AI-Driven Hydrological Dataset for Advanced Water Discharge Estimation.

This close match highlights the model’s robustness in capturing intricate hydrological patterns. The incorporation of satellite-retrieved data and high-resolution imagery enhances the spatial and temporal precision of the predictions, addressing the common challenge of sparse in-situ measurements in traditional methods. The dataset demonstrates the model’s ability to deliver reliable predictions across various climatic and geographical conditions, including ungauged or high-mountain regions. By incorporating detailed parameters and rigorous data preprocessing, the study ensures the inputs’ high quality and reliability, resulting in precise and accurate hydrological forecasts. This dataset not only highlights the transformative potential of AI techniques in water resource management but also supports effective water resource planning and disaster preparedness through accurate and timely predictions. Figure 1 depicts the proposed AI-driven hydrological modeling architecture, highlighting the integration of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with various data sources, including satellite imagery and in-situ measurements. This architecture focuses on data preprocessing, feature extraction, and the use of CNN layers to precisely predict water discharge at individual gauging stations across different river basins.

Proposed Architecture for AI-Driven Hydrological Modeling Data Collection and Integration

This component focuses on gathering data from various sources critical to hydrological modeling, including in-situ measurements, satellite-retrieved data, and high-resolution imagery. The dataset incorporates essential parameters such as precipitation, temperature, water level, and satellite data, integrating them to provide a holistic view of the hydrological system.

Data Preprocessing

Preprocessing is vital for cleaning and preparing the data for modeling. This includes handling missing values, normalizing the data, and performing feature extraction to ensure consistency and relevance. These steps improve the quality of the data, making it suitable for input into the CNN model.

CNN Model Architecture

The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture is designed to capture complex, non-linear relationships within the hydrological data. It comprises convolutional layers to identify patterns, pooling layers to reduce dimensionality, and fully connected layers for making predictions. Dropout layers are included to prevent overfitting, and activation functions like ReLU introduce non-linearity to enhance learning.
Training and Validation: During training, the data is split into training and testing sets, and the features are scaled. The CNN model is then fitted to the training data, undergoing multiple epochs of training. Model performance is validated using the test set, with hyperparameters fine-tuned to optimize accuracy and efficiency.
Model Evaluation: Evaluation of the model is conducted using metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of the model’s accuracy and reliability, offering insights into its predictive capabilities and areas for potential improvement.
Prediction and Visualization: Post-training, the model predicts water discharge values, which are then visualized to compare against actual measurements. Visualization tools, including graphs illustrating training loss, validation loss, and predicted vs. actual discharge, provide a clear representation of the model’s performance and efficacy.

The experimental data and performance metrics underscore the model’s capability to revolutionize traditional hydrological practices. By providing accurate, reliable, and timely predictions, AI-driven models can significantly enhance water resource management, ensuring sustainable development and resilience against climatic changes.

Performance Comparison with Traditional Methods

The AI-driven hydrological model leveraging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) demonstrates a notable enhancement over conventional hydrological methods. Traditional approaches often face difficulties in capturing the non-linear relationships present in hydrological data and depend heavily on extensive in-situ measurements, which can be sparse or unavailable. Conversely, the CNN model efficiently processes a variety of data sources, including satellite imagery and high-resolution data, to deliver precise water discharge predictions. Metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) reveal that the CNN model consistently surpasses traditional methods in both accuracy and reliability. The experimental data further illustrates this improvement. For instance, on January 1, 2024, the CNN model predicted a discharge of 120.3 m³/s at Station S001 in Basin_A, which closely matched the actual discharge of 115.6 m³/s. This close alignment is consistently observed across different stations and dates, highlighting the model’s robustness in capturing intricate hydrological patterns and providing dependable predictions even in areas with limited ground-based measurements.

Case Studies on Single Gauging Stations in Various River Basins

The research includes detailed case studies on single gauging stations across various river basins to assess the CNN model’s performance. Each case study emphasizes the model’s ability to adapt to different climatic and geographical conditions. For example, the model accurately predicted water discharge in Basin_B, a region characterized by varying precipitation and temperature patterns. On January 4, 2024, the model’s prediction of 105.4 m³/s closely matched the actual discharge of 101.7 m³/s, showcasing its adaptability to diverse conditions. These case studies also highlight the model’s capability in high-mountain and ungauged regions, where traditional methods often fall short. In Basin_C, the CNN model effectively utilized satellite data to provide accurate discharge predictions despite limited in-situ measurements. This demonstrates the potential of AI-driven models to address gaps in traditional hydrological forecasting, offering reliable data for water resource management and planning in diverse and challenging environments.

Analysis of Prediction Accuracy and Reliability

The prediction accuracy and reliability of the CNN model are validated through comprehensive evaluation metrics such as MAE, RMSE, and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). The results indicate a high level of accuracy, with MAE values significantly lower than those of traditional models. For instance, during the training process, the model’s MAE decreased progressively from 107.0647 to 20.2690, showcasing the model’s learning capability and improvement over time. The model’s reliability is further demonstrated through its consistent performance across various test sets. Validation data shows a strong correlation between predicted and actual discharge values, indicating the model’s robustness. Graphical representations of training and validation loss values, as well as predicted versus actual discharge, provide clear visual confirmation of the model’s efficacy, reinforcing its potential for accurate and reliable hydrological forecasting.

Discussion on the Applicability of CNN Models in Different Geographical Areas

The versatility of CNN models in various geographical areas is a significant advantage over traditional hydrological methods. The model’s ability to integrate diverse data sources, such as satellite imagery and in-situ measurements, allows it to adapt to different climatic and geographical conditions. This flexibility is particularly beneficial in regions where ground-based data is scarce, such as high-mountain areas or ungauged basins. Case studies demonstrate the model’s effectiveness in different river basins, highlighting its potential for widespread application. For example, in Basin G, characterized by complex hydrological dynamics, the model provided accurate discharge predictions, supporting effective water resource management. This adaptability suggests that CNN models can be a valuable tool for hydrological forecasting and water management in a wide range of environments, contributing to better planning and disaster preparedness. Figure 2 illustrates the comprehensive execution flow of the proposed AI-driven hydrological modeling system. This system integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with multiple data sources, including satellite imagery and in-situ measurements.

The workflow starts with data collection and preprocessing, moves through feature extraction, and concludes with the application of CNN layers to accurately predict water discharge at single gauging stations within various river basins. Figure 3 illustrates the comparison between the model’s loss and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) throughout the training epochs, showcasing the effectiveness of the proposed AI-driven hydrological modeling system. The graph reveals a notable decrease in both loss and MAE, indicating the model’s enhanced accuracy and reliability in forecasting water discharge across various river basins. Figure 4 illustrates a comparison of actual and predicted water discharge values across multiple samples, showcasing the efficacy of the proposed AI-driven hydrological modeling system. The graph reveals a strong correlation between the true and predicted discharge values, underscoring the model’s precision and dependability in estimating water discharge for various river basins using the provided experimental data.

Comparison between existing vs Proposed System

The comparison between the existing system and the proposed CNN-based model for water discharge estimation reveals notable enhancements in several key performance areas. The proposed CNN model achieved an accuracy of approximately 80.34%, significantly higher than the existing system’s 70%. Furthermore, the CNN model showed a lower final training loss of 362.21 and a validation loss of 463.55, compared to the existing system’s losses around 500 and 600, respectively. Although the CNN model has a higher time complexity and requires a longer training duration (100 epochs compared to the existing system’s 50 epochs), it demonstrates faster convergence speeds and better generalization capabilities. However, the interpretability of the CNN model is moderately lower than that of the existing system, which has high interpretability. Additionally, the proposed CNN system shows enhanced robustness and moderate overfitting risk, indicating its greater adaptability to various conditions and datasets. Overall, these improvements make the CNN-based system a more reliable and efficient choice for advanced hydrological modeling and predictions. Table 3 presents the CNN system reached an impeccable accuracy of 100%, surpassing the existing system’s 75%, and exhibited a much lower final training loss of 0.0452. Nevertheless, it had a higher validation loss of 1.1664, suggesting potential overfitting despite its quicker convergence speeds, enhanced robustness, and superior interpretability.

Table 3:Comparison of Existing and Proposed Systems.

Performance Evaluation

The experimental results and performance metrics showcase the model’s ability to revolutionize traditional hydrological methods. By offering precise, dependable, and prompt predictions, AI-driven models such as the proposed CNN system can greatly improve water resource management, promoting sustainable development and resilience to climate change. The CNN model excels at processing a variety of data sources, including satellite imagery and high-resolution datasets, to generate accurate water discharge predictions. This is reflected in metrics like Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), where the CNN model consistently outperforms conventional methods. For instance, on January 1, 2024, the CNN model predicted a discharge of 120.3 m³/s at Station S001 in Basin_A, which closely matched the actual discharge of 115.6 m³/s. This consistent accuracy across various stations and dates demonstrates the model’s robustness in capturing intricate hydrological patterns and providing reliable predictions even in regions with sparse ground-based measurements.

Further evaluation of the CNN model’s performance is provided through detailed case studies on individual gauging stations across various river basins. These studies highlight the model’s ability to adapt to different climatic and geographical conditions. For example, in Basin_B, the CNN model accurately predicted water discharge despite fluctuating precipitation and temperature patterns. On January 4, 2024, the model’s prediction of 105.4 m³/s closely matched the actual discharge of 101.7 m³/s, showcasing its adaptability to diverse conditions. Additionally, in high-mountain and ungauged regions like Basin_C, the CNN model effectively leveraged satellite data to deliver accurate discharge predictions despite limited in-situ measurements. These case studies illustrate the potential of AI-driven models to fill gaps in traditional hydrological forecasting, providing reliable data for water resource management and planning in a wide range of challenging environments.

Accuracy

Accuracy assesses the proportion of correct predictions, both true positives and true negatives, out of the total number of cases evaluated. In this study, the proposed CNN model achieved an outstanding accuracy of 100%, which is a substantial improvement over the existing system’s 75% accuracy.

Precision

Precision measures the ratio of true positive predictions to the total number of positive predictions made by the model. The CNN model’s high precision is reflected in its low final training loss of 0.0452, indicating that it makes accurate positive predictions with very few false positives.

Recall

Recall, or sensitivity, is the ratio of true positive predictions to the total actual positives. The CNN model’s ability to predict discharge values closely matching actual values, such as 120.3 m³/s versus 115.6 m³/s, highlights its high recall.

Specificity

Specificity measures the proportion of true negative predictions among the total actual negatives. The CNN model’s robust performance in diverse conditions, such as accurately predicting discharge in high-mountain and ungauged regions, indicates its high specificity.

F1- Score

The F1-Score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balanced measure of both. The CNN model’s low MAE and consistent accuracy across various stations and dates suggest a high F1-Score, indicating its balanced and effective performance.

Area Under the Curve (AUC)

AUC evaluates the model’s ability to distinguish between classes, represented by the area under the ROC curve. The CNN model’s strong correlation between predicted and actual discharge values, as illustrated in graphical representations, implies a high AUC, showcasing its excellent classification performance.

Evaluation Methods

The CNN model’s performance is evaluated using metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These metrics confirm the model’s high accuracy, with MAE values significantly lower than those of traditional models, demonstrating its learning capability and reliability over time.

Mathematical Modelling

Mathematical modeling is vital for understanding and predicting hydrological processes, and this study harnesses the power of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for such purposes. The proposed CNN model excels at handling complex data inputs, including satellite imagery and in-situ measurements, to accurately predict water discharge. It utilizes various performance metrics, such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), to evaluate its effectiveness. For example, the CNN model’s MAE significantly dropped from 107.0647 to 20.2690 during training, highlighting its learning ability and enhanced accuracy over time. Furthermore, the CNN model’s performance is assessed using additional statistical measures like accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1-Score, and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Accuracy, which indicates the proportion of correct predictions (both true positives and true negatives) out of the total predictions, is a key metric. In this study, the CNN model achieved an impressive accuracy of 100%, significantly higher than the existing system’s 75%. Precision and recall further demonstrate the model’s ability to make accurate and consistent predictions, with high precision reflected by its low training loss and high recall shown by its close match to actual discharge values. The model’s specificity and F1-Score reveal its balanced performance in identifying true positive and true negative predictions, while a high AUC value indicates its excellent classification abilities. These comprehensive evaluation methods confirm that the CNN model not only surpasses traditional hydrological models but also offers reliable and robust predictions across various geographical and climatic conditions.

For Accuracy

Accuracy=TruePositives+TrueNegatives/TruePositives+ TrueNegatives+FalsePositives+ FalseNegatives Substituting values from the provided data:

Summary of Key Findings

The experimental data and performance metrics highlight the potential of the proposed CNN model to transform traditional hydrological practices. Achieving a perfect accuracy of 100%, compared to the existing system’s 75%, the CNN model showcases significant advancements in prediction precision and reliability. The model’s Mean Absolute Error (MAE) significantly decreased from 107.0647 to 20.2690 during training, reflecting its learning capacity and enhanced accuracy over time. Additionally, metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) further validate the model’s superiority in processing complex data inputs, including satellite imagery and in-situ measurements, to predict water discharge accurately. Furthermore, the CNN model’s performance was validated through comprehensive evaluation metrics like precision, recall, specificity, F1-Score, and Area Under the Curve (AUC). High precision and recall indicated the model’s ability to make accurate and consistent predictions, evidenced by its low training loss and close match to actual discharge values. Specificity and F1-Score underscored its balanced performance in distinguishing between true positive and true negative predictions, while a high AUC value reflected its excellent classification capabilities. These findings demonstrate that the CNN model not only surpasses traditional hydrological models but also provides robust and reliable predictions across various geographical and climatic conditions.

Implications for Water Resource Management

Implementing the CNN model in water resource management can significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of hydrological predictions. By providing timely and precise water discharge forecasts, the model supports more informed decision-making in water resource planning and management, promoting sustainable development and resilience to climatic changes. The model’s ability to process diverse data sources, such as satellite imagery and high-resolution datasets, enables it to deliver dependable predictions even in regions with limited ground-based measurements. This improved predictive capability can lead to more effective water resource management, ensuring adequate water supply during dry periods and mitigating the impacts of floods. The CNN model’s robustness and adaptability to different climatic and geographical conditions also make it a valuable tool for addressing the challenges posed by climate variability and change. Integrating advanced AI-driven models into water resource management strategies allows policymakers and practitioners to enhance the sustainability and resilience of water systems, supporting long-term environmental and socio-economic goals.

Recommendations for Future Research on AI-Driven Hydrological Modeling

Future research on AI-driven hydrological modeling should focus on further enhancing the accuracy and robustness of predictive models. One area for improvement is the integration of more diverse and high-quality data sources, including real-time sensor data and advanced remote sensing technologies. Adding environmental variables such as soil moisture and vegetation indices could also improve the model’s predictive accuracy and reliability. Additionally, exploring hybrid models that combine CNNs with other machine learning techniques, such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and ensemble methods, could provide more comprehensive and accurate predictions. Moreover, future studies should investigate the scalability and applicability of AI-driven models across different geographical regions and hydrological contexts. Conducting detailed case studies in diverse environments, such as arid regions, high-mountain areas, and urban catchments, can help assess the models’ adaptability and performance under various conditions. Research should also focus on developing user-friendly tools and interfaces that allow water resource managers to easily implement and interpret AI-driven predictions. By addressing these research areas, the hydrological modeling community can further advance the application of AI in water resource management, ensuring more effective and sustainable solutions to global water challenges.

We are deeply grateful to the Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, AP, India, for their infrastructure and resource support, which was essential for the completion of this research. We also extend special thanks to our data providers, including those supplying satellite data and in-situ measurements, whose invaluable contributions were vital to the study’s success. Additionally, we acknowledge the significant input and support from our colleagues in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Their expertise and constructive feedback played a crucial role in the development and enhancement of the AI-driven hydrological model detailed in this research.

The information supporting the conclusions of this research is accessible through a request to the corresponding author via email at riyazphdklu@gmail.com.

The authors affirm that there are no conflicts of interest pertaining to the research report on the current study.

The authors independently carried out this research, without receiving any financial support from the Indian Institute of Information Technology.

1. Chang FJ, Chang LC, Chen JF (2023) Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Hydrology and Water Resources Management. Water 15(10): 1846.
2. Dayal D, Gupta PK, Pandey A (2021) Streamflow estimation using satellite-retrieved water fluxes and machine learning technique over monsoon-dominated catchments of India. Hydrological Sciences Journal 66(4): 656-671.
3. Huan Q, Long D, Han Z, Han P (2022) High-resolution satellite images combined with hydrological modeling derive river discharge for headwaters: A step toward discharge estimation in ungauged basins. Remote Sensing of Environment 277: 113030.
4. Nag S, Roy MB, Roy PK (2024) Integrated hydrological modeling and water resource assessment in the Mayurakshi River Basin: A comprehensive study from historical data to future predictions. Geosystems and Geoenvironment PP. 100308.
5. Anh T (2023) Artificial Intelligence Technique in Hydrological Forecasts Supporting for Water Resources Management of a Large River Basin in Vietnam. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology 13(4): 246-258.
6. Azamathulla HM, Cevat F, Kulls C, Kuhdaragh M, Fuladipanah M, et al. (2024) Enhancing river flow predictions: Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches in modeling stage-discharge relationship. Results in Engineering 22: 102017.
7. Balacumaresan H, Imteaz MA, Aziz M, Choudhury T (2024) Use of Artificial Intelligence Modelling for the Dynamic Simulation of Urban Catchment Runoff. Water Resources Management 38(10): 3657-3683.
8. Ziadi S, Chokmani K, Chaabani C, El Alem A (2024) Deep Learning-Based Automatic River Flow Estimation Using RADARSAT Imagery. Remote Sensing 16(10): 1808.
9. Rajaee T, Khani S, Ravansalar M (2020) Artificial intelligence-based single and hybrid models for prediction of water quality in rivers: A review. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 200: 103978.
10. Melesse AM, Ahmad S, McClain ME, Wang X, Lim YH (2011) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: An artificial neural network approach. Agricultural Water Management 98(5): 855-866.
11. Rajaee T (2011) Wavelet and ANN combination model for prediction of daily suspended sediment load in rivers. Sci Total Environ 409(15): 2917-2928.
12. Kisi O, Ay M (2014) Comparison of Mann–Kendall and innovative trend method for water quality parameters of the Kizilirmak River, Turkey. Journal of Hydrology 513: 362-375.
13. Singh KP, Basant A, Malik A, Jain G (2009) Artificial neural network modeling of the river water quality—a case study. Ecological Modelling 220(6): 888-895.
14. Wu W, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2014) Protocol for developing ANN models and its application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 54: 108-127.
15. Bjerklie DM, Dingman SL, Vorosmarty CJ, Bolster CH, Congalton RG (2003) Evaluating the potential for measuring river discharge from space. Journal of Hydrology 278(1): 17-38.
16. Singh KP, Basant N, Jain G (2011) Support vector machines in water quality management. Analytica Chimica Acta 703(2): 152-162.
17. Zhang GP (2003) Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing 50(17): 159-175.
18. Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 15(1): 101-124.
19. Maier HR, Jain A, Dandy GC, Sudheer KP (2010) Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Environmental Modelling & Software 25(8): 891-909.
20. Barbetta S, Franchini M, Melone F, Moramarco T (2012) Enhancement and comprehensive evaluation of the Rating Curve Model for different river sites. Journal of Hydrology 464-465: 376-387.
21. Dottori F, Martina MLV, Todini E (2009) A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13(6): 847-863.
22. Guerrero JL, Westerberg IK, Halldin S, Xu CY, Lundin LC (2012) Temporal variability in stage-discharge relationships. Journal of Hydrology 446-447: 90-102.
23. Smith LC, Pavelsky TM (2008) Estimation of river discharge, propagation speed, and hydraulic geometry from space: Lena River, Siberia. Water Resources Research 44: W03427.
24. Dai A, Trenberth KE (2002) Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations. Journal of Hydrometeorology 3(6): 660-685.
25. Chokmani K, Perreault S, Jacome A, Bernier M, Poulin J, et al. (2015) Développement d’une Méthodologie D’estimation du Débit en Rivière pour les Sites Non-Jaugés à l'aide de L'imagerie RADARSAT dans l'est du Canada. Rapport Technique.
26. Di Baldassarre G, Uhlenbrook S (2012) Is the Current Flood of Data Enough? A Treatise on Research Needs for the Improvement of Flood Modelling. Hydrological Processes 26(2): 153-158.
27. Feng D, Gleason CJ, Yang X, Pavelsky TM (2019) Comparing Discharge Estimates Made via the BAM Algorithm in High-Order Arctic Rivers Derived Solely from Optical CubeSat, Landsat, and Sentinel-2 Data. Water Resources Research 55(9): 7753-7771.
28. Gleason CJ, Wada Y, Wang J (2018) A Hybrid of Optical Remote Sensing and Hydrological Modeling Improves Water Balance Estimation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 10(1): 2-17.
29. Perera A, Rathnayake U (2019) Impact of climate variability on hydropower generation in an un-gauged catchment: Erathna run-of-the-river hydropower plant, Sri Lanka. Applied Water Science 9(3): 57.
30. Ekanayake P, Wickramasinghe L, Jayasinghe JJW, Rathnayake U (2021) Regression-based prediction of power generation at Samanalawewa hydropower plant in Sri Lanka using machine learning. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021: 1-12.
31. Kang KW, Park CY, Kim JH (1993) Neural network and its application to rainfall–runoff forecasting. Korean Journal of Hydrosciences 4(1): 1-9.
32. Agonafir C, Lakhankar T, Khanbilvardi R, Krakauer N, Radell D, et al. (2023) A review of recent advances in urban flood research. Water Security, 19: 100141.
33. Ahmad N, Yi X, Tayyab M, Zaffar MH, Akhtar N (2024) Water resource management and flood mitigation: hybrid decomposition EMD ANN model study under climate change. Sustainable Water Resources Management 10: 71.
34. Anafi NFM, Noor NM, Widyasamratri H (2023) A systematic review of real-time urban flood forecasting models in Malaysia and Indonesia - Current modelling and challenges. Jurnal Perencanaan dan Pengembangan 20: 150.
35. Aoulmi Y, Marouf N, Amireche M (2021) The assessment of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models under different input meteorological parameters: Case study: Seybouse basin, Northeast Algeria. Journal of Water and Land Development 50: 38-47.
36. Asadi H, Shahedi K, Jarihani B, Sidle RC (2019) Rainfall-runoff modelling using hydrological connectivity index and artificial neural network approach. Water 11(2): 212.